A field led by the Boston University School of Medicine has eased bad awe   after revealing no link between the numeral or length of antepartum ultrasounds and a child ’s later development ofautism spectrum disorder(ASD ) .

The findings represent one more in a current of investigations that have failed to name a directgeneticorenvironmental causeof ASD , though a variety of factors are now known to increase the risk of developing .

In late years , high - power ultrasound devices –   the form that can create a 3D characterization of a foetus ’s features   –   have become an more and more popular tool for monitoring gestation . Because rate of ASD diagnosis haverisen sharplyduring the same meter physical body , foetal exposure to ultrasound was quick implicated as a potential constituent for its cause . Some subsequent experiments in beast fetuses suggested that these devices canmodify brain formation , leading to changes in store , learnedness , and sociability once the organism is born .

To value the radio link   in humans , the authors of the current investigation , release inJAMA Pediatrics ,   go over the aesculapian records of 107 otherwise healthy kid with ASD , 104 children with a non - ASD developmental wait , and 209 youngster with normal neurologic development .

The information showed that normal children and those with ASD or developmental postponement were all exposed to the same average phone number of ultrasounds ( about six ) as fetuses , and that the time drive for each scan was similar . The scans ’ averagethermal index –   the approximated amount of fetal tissue warming that occurs during a scan – were also the same between groups .

“ In almost every parameter we front at , sonography seemed utterly safe , ” conscientious objector - author N. Paul Rosman toldThe Washington Post .

The only difference between group was the astuteness that sonography waves permeate into the enate and fetal tissue paper . Scans of ASD fetuses had a slenderly greater mediocre depth during the first and 2d trimester compared with CAT scan performed on normal foetus .

Ultrasonography consists of sending pulses of high - frequency sound into tissue paper and create an persona from the pattern of reflected or scattered soundwaves . Though the absolute frequency used for medical imaging has long been deal safe , the FDA and theAmerican College of Obstetriciansagree that exposureshould be limiteddue to the opening of undiscovered side effects .

Thus , the authors noted   that the deeper scan profoundness could lead   to increased penetration of soundwaves through the skull and into the fetal brain , potentially castrate the brain cell ontogenesis hap within . They conclude by calling for next studies into ultrasound scan deepness and ASD .

However , other paediatric specialists , like the two physicians who indite anaccompanying editorial , are unbelieving that such a modest difference in scan profundity could calculate for the development of a severe neurological circumstance such as ASD .